As the relentless bull charges onward into its 8th year, I believe
this is a good time to take a step back and examine the larger picture. It has
been 8 years since the bulls wrestled control from the bears in the depths of
the Great Recession in 2009, ever since the Dow Jones Industrial Average
bottomed out on 9 March 2009.
Through these 8 years we have witnessed numerous events that threatened to halt
the bull on its upward charge [Story].
Yet through all the turmoil, the S&P500 managed to post a stunning >250% gain
from that low point struck in 2009. On hindsight, the market has indeed come a
long way from the tumult of the past, but the question of concern now is, how far and for how long more can the bull
continue soldiering on?
Of course, the answer to this question would be anyone's guess, but we
can evaluate empirical
data from the past to draw parallels and perhaps come to certain
conclusions. Nobody
can tell precisely when the bulls will throw in the towel, but it is
without doubt that the markets move in
cycles and the bears will take charge again one day in future. Rather than
trying to pinpoint an end to this bull market, I attempt to gauge where we
could be in the current cycle and what we could possibly look out for.
Patching Together Parallels
Perhaps we could start by examining the charts of notable bull markets
since the 70s (or about as far back as Tradingview
allows me to go). I know there are plenty
of people who scoff at the idea of looking at charts (hindsight is always
clearer than foresight, confirmation bias etc) and I respect that view, but
charts do paint pictures of the past like a history book. It is up to us (the historians) to interpret.
Nonetheless, as the modern economy and stock markets only go back so far in
time, we may not possess a large enough
sample size for comparisons.
All the charts were indexed at 0% at
the beginning of their time period, for ease of comparison.
The Late-70s Bull:
The 80s Bull:
The Legendary 90s Bull:
The 00s Bull: (we all know
what happened after that)
Several Observations: (could be due to confirmation bias)
- All the bulls have witnessed
at least one big decline in its lifetime, which could have led many people to
think that "it's over", but the bull ultimately regained its footing
and trudged higher (may not be the case for the 00s)
- Strong rallies tended to
follow these sharp, deep declines
- The final years of a bull
market tend to return more than the early years, usually cumulating in one
final big surge before putting in a top (1980, 1987, 1999, 2006)
- They tend to range rather
widely at their tops before the eventual decline (with the exception of Black
Monday 1987)
- The topping out action tends to foreshadow a looming recession
ahead, even when the GDP growth numbers have not yet turned negative. However,
a market crash does not necessarily signal a recession, as was the case in 1987
Looking at the current bull market in this context, we appear to have
just emerged from another "it's over" phase from 2015 to 2016, the
previous one dating back to 2011. The sharp
spike higher since the 2016 lows then seems to follow the trend of strong rallies after a sharp decline.
Are returns then, going to accelerate, cumulating in one big final surge? Or
could this just be the start of another leg up before a long consolidation
phase?
Either could be the case, but taking into account the typical length
of bull markets (see graphic below), we see that this bull has very likely already surpassed the halfway
mark of its lifespan and could now be in its final dash. If that is the case, then the bull probably has
anywhere between 6 to 24 months left in this
cycle.
Source: Mackenzie Investments website
Again, all these judgements are solely
based on empirical data, without using any other indicators or techniques
(eg. Elliot waves). Market forecasting is more of an art than an actual science,
after all.
The Ominous Signal of Looming Trouble
However, one rather reliable indicator shows that the bulls have no
intention of laying down yet. While more of an economic indicator itself, the constant maturity spread between 10 and 2
year US government bond yields (2y-10y spread for short) has been
remarkably accurate at foreshadowing
recessions ever since the 1970s. Notice than when the spread dips below the
zero-line (when the sovereign yield curve inverts), a recessionary period
(marked out in grey) follows not long afterwards. The spread then widens again
throughout the recession.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis website
While the 2y-10y spread better reflects the credit cycle in the USA
(and the rest of the developed world which follows not far behind), the credit
cycle is very similar to the economic cycle, to put things simply. The stock
market tends to lead the economic cycle. Thus, an inverted yield curve could be a warning sign signalling a market top.
Then again, the data set may be too small to form a statistically sound
argument for this ominous signal. But since history tends to repeat itself, it pays to keep an eye on the yield
curve.
As the 2y-10y spread currently hovers around 1%,
the "clear" signal is still flashing strong, but note that it is
considerably lower than the 2.5% levels seen
earlier in the decade. Based on this
data alone, a market top or a recession does not appear to be around the corner.
Looking Ahead: Possible Strategies
(Investing)
- Do not chase the rally,
wait to buy on pullbacks. However, one should bear in mind the risk of that
pullback in particular turning into the start of the next bear market
- For investors, it is perhaps prudent to trim positions and take some profits off the table following
big surges. Alternatively, those with sizable US equity portfolios could
employ strategies to hedge downside (more on that later)
- US stocks look pricey based on valuations, but could have more room
to run à US corporate profits easily
beat lowered expectations in 2016, and the most recent earnings season
hinted at a possible rebound in corporate earnings, which could provide
catalyst for more upside. But with the market rather pricey now, stock
selection is of crucial importance.
- Now is not the best time to enter into passive index-tracking
funds/ETFs for the long term, when we are in a late stage bull market
- Low-beta dividend stocks may seem boring, but those offer a cushion
against market volatility when periodic shocks occur
- The local market (Straits Times Index) -- Singapore is the best performing
market in Asia year-to-date in 2017, roaring back to
life by decisively breaking above 3000 and then 3100
points, surprising many people (myself included). This is a
possible "revaluation" trade as many counters which have been bogged
down for many years (eg. property developers) are coming back to life again. We
are still way short of the 2015 highs in the 3500
range but it would be a huge surprise if
the STI manages to reach that level within a single year. Trading at around
14 times price-to earnings, the STI is still
relatively cheap compared to other markets and could have more room to run. Perhaps
the best course of action is to seek out
undervalued and overlooked counters that have potential to be the
"next big movers".
- The bond markets could see some radical changes this year as US interest rate hikes may happen at a
quicker than expected pace. This marks a drastic reversal from an era of
low rates the world has gotten hooked on. Long-dated
sovereign bond yields have risen sharply since bottoming out in 1H16.
Should economic conditions pick up, the European Central Bank and Bank of Japan
could quickly cut their Quantitative Easing programmes and raise interest rates
back above zero -- now is
not the best time to invest in bonds. That said however, local
corporate bonds with shorter durations may be less sensitive to interest rate
movements, and individual bonds are affected by corporate yield spreads (above
the risk-free rate) as well as individual company credit conditions.
- Investors with net-long equity exposure in the US markets could
consider hedging their portfolios through what is known as a "collar" options strategy,
which can be executed for net zero cost
(excluding fees). This involves buying put options at a strike price below current
market price, and selling call options at strike prices above market current
price. If both the put and call option here have the same value, the trade does
not entail any cost. While it protects
the portfolio to the downside, the investor gives up potential upside above the
higher strike price in return.
Looking Ahead: Possible Strategies
(Trading)
- Low volatility environment at present, with 103
consecutive days (and counting) since a 1% decline in the S&P500,
coupled with low VIX readings. The market has rewarded those who caught the
"Trump Trade" or "Reflation Trade" early on in Dec 2016.
Betting against the market rally outright has been a painful strategy for
traders.
- There could be a (overdue) correction or consolidation in the near
term (next 3-4 months), which is ultimately vital and healthy for the
continuation of the current bull.
- The continued spread between implied and realised volatility -- buying volatility has been a poor trade
lately, especially through VIX-linked ETFs, as the steep contango of the VIX futures curve has led to big losses on
such products. [More
Info] But selling volatility
outright is risky as well, exposing oneself to sudden shocks that could
jerk the market and cause a spike in volatility. As equities now show some
signs of near-term consolidation or range-bound trading, selling covered calls or call spreads could be a viable strategy
for traders.
- Equity put options are reasonably priced, with at-the-money implied volatility hovering around 12.5 for put options on the S&P500 ETF (SPY) expiring a couple of months out, but
buying them outright entails a net cost. Buying puts essentially bets on a
spike in volatility and a falling market in the coming months. The trade would
be a losing one should such an outcome not materialise, as time decay eats away at option values.
- Trading opportunities in gold (my thoughts on gold), which is also
likely to soar should any black swan event happen this year (keep an eye on the
European elections). Rate hikes may not dampen gold prices for long periods, as
long as the "reflation trade" and expectations for higher inflation
under the Trump administration persist.
The Final Word
For all we know, the bears could return as soon as next month or as late as the
end of the decade. The reality is that life is uncertain and there are far
too many factors and variables that influence the markets. Since nobody knows
for certain what is going to happen in future, we can at best make informed and
educated forecasts, and adjust them accordingly as conditions change. Whether
they turn out to be true or not... only time will tell.
Just my two cents.
You don't write like a 20 year old guy. Great analysis there.
ReplyDelete